METHODICAL PRINCIPLES OF PROPERTY RIGHTS COSTS DETERMINATION FOR COURT DECISION INVALID CONFESSION TRANSACTIONS

  • Pozdnyakov Yu., Sadovenko Yu. Ukrainian Society of Appraisers
Keywords: real estate and property rights valuation/appraising, market value, purchase-sale transaction, court decision, confession of transaction invalid, economically-legal consequences, intangible asset, bundle of complete property rights, package of partial property rights

Abstract

An operating legislative base that touches the questions of confession invalid legal transactions is analyzed in the article, in particular - agreements of property purchase-sale transactions. It is set that the actual operating legislatively-normative base of independent valuation/appraising does not specify estimation methodical approaches for the similar tasks decision. An urgent practical requirement is confirmed in deep research of this problem with the next acceptance and normative establishment of some compatible recommendations for methodical base of independent valuation/appraising. Law consequences that arise up in case of confession of such agreements invalid in the judicial order court decisions are considered. As a result of research and interpretation of legislative acts law provisions within the limits of modern economical measuring paradigm, executed by independent valuation/appraising methods, the principles of corresponding methodical base choice background is done for property rights costs settling calculating determination of transaction invalid confession.

It is educed by researches, that implementation of evaluation works in this class cases is highly complicated by the large variety of possible evaluation situations. The variation spectrum of these evaluation situations descriptions demonstrates considerable variation in the wide range of major characteristics, such as: purchase-sale transaction property costs; conditions of property sale; descriptions of the same class property market situation; period of time term that passed from a purchase-sale transaction property agreement conclusion moment to the moment of this agreement invalid confession, and others like that. In the article it is suggested to carry out differentiation of all possible this class tasks evaluation situations on the basis of their dichotomy division with the sign of time period duration passed from a purchase-sale transaction property agreement conclusion moment to the moment of this agreement invalid confession court decision.

It is educed that the major economically-legal consequences of court decision about transaction agreement invalid confession within the limits of it’s interpretation in the modern economical measurements paradigm are the facts of appearance of the mutual unliquidated debts between purchase-sale transaction agreement parties, and also appearance these parties duty on bilateral agreement property restitution. It is well-proven that the date of this mutual debts appearance is chronologically due to the moment of court decision about transaction agreement invalid confession cramps acceptance. But here, in obedience to an actually operating legislative norm, the term of this debt existence follows to deduct from the date of the transaction agreement confessed.

The last conclusion is predefined by operating legislative norm, in obedience to which the legal "transaction confessed by a court invalid is invalid from the moment due the transaction date". Id est, court law qualification of legal transaction that took place in a past tense is corrected at that rate nowadays court decreets - and the task of appraiser is to obtain and define by calculation economic changes number that took place as a result of this adjustment in nowadays contemporaneity.

It is shown that at purchase-sale transaction property agreement subject legal status uncertainty situation presence, in most general case of the evaluation situations investigated class; it is expedient to examine the property rights costs as an intangible asset. On the basis of the got conclusions it is suggested for this class tasks decision to apply methodologies of independent valuation/appraising, which are used for the of costs estimation of the most closely near after economic non-material assets valuation/appraising, - namely, account receivable.

Thus, as a result of undertaken study and analysis of operating legislative base it is set forth and proved some practical recommendations, especially of independent estimation methodical base choice suitable for the property (property rights) costs calculation obtaining on the legal transactions agreements confessed invalid in the judicial order. Possibility and expediency of interpretation of estimation object, that was transaction agreement subject in such evaluation situations, are shown.

 So, estimation object is examined as an intangible asset - namely, as a bundle/package of complete or partial property rights, depending on the degree of estimation object legal status uncertainty and the time period duration passed from a purchase-sale transaction property agreement conclusion moment to the moment of this agreement invalid confession court decision. In the further researches prospect for this class evaluation tasks an increase attention for the questions of estimation date precise specification, adequate estimation base choice, ground the possibilities of some valuation/appraising methodical approaches using or casting-out is required.

References

1. Національний стандарт оцінки №1 «Загальні засади оцінки майна і майнових прав» // Постанова КМУ від 10.09.2003 р. № 1440.
2. Національний стандарт оцінки № 4 «Оцінка нематеріальних активів». Проект. [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: http://www.uto.com.ua/files/doc /Novosti/NSO_proekt_24_12_2015_12_01_2016%D0%A4%D0%94%D0%9C%D0%A3.pdf.
3. Національний стандарт оцінки №4 «Оцінка майнових прав інтелектуальної влас-ності» // Постанова КМУ від 03.10.2007 р. № 1185.
4. Цивільний кодекс України. Відомості Верховної Ради України (ВВР), 2003, №№ 40-44, ст. 356. [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15.
Published
2019-12-17